Maintain and certify aircraft of all types from small aeroplanes to airliners, jet fighters and helicopters, both civil and military.
Apprentices learn to maintain and certify a wide range of aircraft, from light aeroplanes and helicopters through to commercial airliners and military jets. The programme covers aircraft structures, materials, electrical and electronic systems, flight controls, hydraulics, propulsion, and undercarriage. Apprentices develop skills in fault diagnosis, scheduled maintenance, defect rectification, and modifications, all carried out in line with civil or military regulatory requirements. Accurate completion of aircraft documentation and understanding the limits of certification authority are central to the role.
Working in hangars and on the apron, apprentices carry out inspections, component removal and replacement, functional checks, and corrosion control on aircraft systems. They use specialist hand tools, mechanical equipment, and electronic test equipment, interpreting maintenance manuals and technical data to complete tasks correctly. Documentation is completed after every task, certifying work to the required standard. Apprentices interact regularly with flight crew, shift leaders, and colleagues, and as competence develops, they begin to oversee and support the work of others.
Completing this apprenticeship leads to an Aircraft Maintenance Licence or equivalent authorisation, which is a legal requirement to certify aircraft. Typical job titles include licensed aircraft engineer, certifying engineer, avionics engineer, and maintenance supervisor. With experience, progression into senior engineering and management roles is well established. Employers span commercial airlines, MRO (maintenance, repair and overhaul) organisations, defence contractors, helicopter operators, and business aviation companies. Both civil and military career paths are open, and the licence retains value across international aviation markets.
Sorted by achievement rate.
No training providers currently listed for this standard.
Qualified apprentices typically move into licensed or certifying roles, signing off maintenance work on their own authority. Common job titles include Aircraft Maintenance Engineer, Licensed Aircraft Engineer, Licensed Avionics Engineer, and Aircraft Certifying Engineer. Some step into Aircraft Maintenance Supervisor positions, taking direct responsibility for overseeing shift teams and sign-off activity. The specific licence category held (mechanical, avionics, or combined) shapes the exact scope of work an individual can certify.
With three to five years of post-qualification experience, engineers often progress to Senior Aircraft Maintenance Engineer, taking on broader certification authority, more complex fault diagnosis, and mentoring responsibilities for junior staff. From there, two distinct tracks open up. The leadership route leads toward Engineering Manager, responsible for maintenance planning, regulatory compliance and team management. The specialist route leads toward type-rated or multi-type authority, deeper systems expertise, and roles in quality assurance or continuing airworthiness management.
Employers span commercial aviation, military aviation, and general aviation. On the civil side, that includes scheduled airlines, MRO (maintenance, repair and overhaul) organisations, charter operators, and business jet operators. Military roles sit within the armed forces and their contracted support partners. Smaller operators, flying schools, and helicopter operators also employ certifying engineers. The role exists in both the public sector and across a wide range of private employers, from large international MRO facilities to single-site regional operations.
Throughout the programme, apprentices build competence in real aircraft maintenance work, applying knowledge of aviation legislation, aircraft systems, inspection techniques and certification requirements while employed. Assessment is not a single event at the end; progress is reviewed continuously against the knowledge, skills and behaviours set out in the standard. Before final assessment, a gateway check confirms the apprentice is ready, with sign-off from both employer and training provider. Final assessment then confirms the apprentice can perform the certifying technician role to the required standard. Assessment models for many standards are currently being updated, so check the standard's gov.uk page for the current specification.
Building a strong body of workplace evidence from early in the programme makes a significant difference at assessment. Apprentices should keep records of real maintenance tasks, fault diagnosis work, documentation they have completed, and situations where they have applied regulatory requirements or supported colleagues. Waiting until near the end to gather evidence creates unnecessary pressure. Regular reviews with the training provider and line manager help ensure progress against the full range of knowledge, skills and behaviours is tracked and any gaps are addressed in good time.
Look for providers with direct relationships with approved maintenance organisations (AMOs) or Military Aviation Authority-recognised sites, since practical sign-off experience must happen in a real hangar environment, not a simulated one. Achievement rates above 65% are a reasonable baseline; given the 45-month duration and the regulatory complexity involved, anything consistently above 75% suggests the provider is retaining and supporting learners through to licence-level competence. On FATP profiles, check employer satisfaction scores alongside learner reviews that mention hands-on access to live aircraft, not just classroom theory. Coverage of both civil and military pathways is worth confirming if your organisation operates under MAA rather than CAA regulation.
Be cautious of providers whose learner volume has grown sharply but whose achievement rate has dropped, as that pattern often signals stretched support for technically demanding programmes. Vague answers about which aircraft types apprentices work on during training, or providers who rely heavily on classroom-based simulation for tasks that require physical aircraft access, are warning signs. If a provider cannot point to recent completers holding an Aircraft Maintenance Licence or equivalent authorisation, that gap deserves scrutiny. Outdated regulatory references, particularly around EASA versus UK CAA post-Brexit frameworks, suggest curriculum that has not kept pace.
Employers set their own entry criteria, but candidates typically need a good standard of secondary education, including maths and English. Some employers require GCSEs at grade 4 or above in relevant subjects, or equivalent qualifications. A genuine interest in engineering and aviation is expected. Candidates must also be fit to work in a hangar and line maintenance environment, and some employers will require security clearance, particularly those working on military aircraft.
The typical duration is around 45 months. Throughout the programme, apprentices remain employed and apply their learning directly in the workplace. A portion of contracted hours must be spent on off-the-job training. The exact minimum duration and required off-the-job percentage are subject to change under current Skills England reforms, so check the latest specification on the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education page on gov.uk before planning your intake.
Before taking the end-point assessment, the apprentice must pass through a gateway, at which point the employer and training provider confirm the apprentice has met all the knowledge, skills and behaviour requirements in the standard. Assessment models for many standards are being updated as part of ongoing reforms, so check the current specification on gov.uk. The apprentice will need to demonstrate technical competence, safe working practice and the ability to certify aircraft maintenance tasks accurately.
The funding band for this standard is £27,000, which is the maximum government contribution toward training costs. Large employers who pay the apprenticeship levy draw costs from their digital account. Smaller employers co-invest, paying 5% of training costs with the government contributing the remaining 95%. Employers with fewer than 50 staff taking on an apprentice aged 16 to 18 pay nothing; the government covers the full cost. Funding does not cover the apprentice's wage.
Day-to-day work involves scheduled maintenance, defect diagnosis and rectification, modifications and aircraft inspections, all carried out to Standard Operating Procedures. Apprentices use hand tools and specialist test equipment to work on systems including flight controls, hydraulics, undercarriage and avionics. They complete and certify aircraft documentation accurately after each task, work alongside flight crew and shift leaders, and may assist in supervising others. The work takes place in hangars for base maintenance and outdoors on the apron for line maintenance.
Completion leads toward holding an Aircraft Maintenance Licence or equivalent regulatory authorisation, which is required to certify maintenance work independently. From there, typical progression routes include senior aircraft maintenance engineer, aircraft maintenance supervisor, or engineering manager. Apprentices may also specialise further in avionics, moving toward a B2 licensed engineer role. Some employers support further technical qualifications or degree-level study, and the hands-on regulatory grounding from this standard is directly transferable across civil and military aviation organisations.
Tell us a bit about your team and we'll send a shortlist.
Tell us your requirements and we'll match you with the right training providers.
Curated by Alex Lockey, FATP founder and editor. Last reviewed: .
Sources include the apprenticeship's official specification on apprenticeships.gov.uk, Skills England guidance, IfATE archive records, DWP funding bands, and provider data sourced directly from the public Apprenticeship Provider and Assessment Register (APAR). Standard reference: 114.
Some sections on this page were drafted with AI assistance from published source data and reviewed by a human editor before publication. See our editorial methodology for how we maintain this content. Spotted something out of date? Tell us.